In an era where fashion trends morph swiftly, and new styles dominate the scene with every passing season, the spotlight often falls on renowned activewear brands that define workout fashion. One such brand that has made waves across platforms is Gymshark. Famed for its chic activewear and reasonable price points, Gymshark has become synonymous with fitness fashion. But the question that looms: Is Gymshark a fast fashion brand?
The answer, in this case, diverges from the spotlight’s glare. Gymshark defies the fast fashion label, carving a niche beyond fleeting trends. This article delves into Gymshark’s distinctive identity and seeks to unravel its place within the fast fashion industry. Join us as we embark on a journey to uncover the essence of Gymshark’s fashion philosophy and its resonance in a world of ever-evolving styles.
Read on to find out more!
About Gymshark
Founded in 2012, Gymshark, a prominent British company, has become a powerhouse in fitness apparel and accessories. What began as a modest venture swiftly transformed into a global sensation. Originally a small business, Gymshark’s trajectory shifted dramatically due to its strategic utilization of social media marketing. With a pervasive online presence, the brand has established itself across 230 countries and boasts an impressive network of 14 online stores.
Image Source: e3.365dm.com
With an astounding 18 million-strong following on various social media platforms, Gymshark’s popularity has soared to unprecedented heights. In 2016, the esteemed recognition from The Sunday Times catapulted the company into the spotlight as the fastest-growing entity in the UK. As of 2020, Gymshark’s valuation escalated to a staggering £1 billion, with the founder, Ben Francis, retaining a significant 70% ownership of the company’s shares.
Gymshark’s product diversity caters to both men and women, encompassing many items. From leggings, crop tops, joggers, shorts, and jackets to sports bras, hoodies, swimwear, and t-shirts, their offerings span the spectrum of fitness apparel.
Notably, the brand extends its influence beyond clothing, including an assortment of fitness accessories such as bags, bottles, socks, and headwear. This comprehensive range solidifies Gymshark’s status as an industry titan that combines quality, innovation, and strategic marketing prowess.
What Are Fast Fashion Brands?
Fast fashion refers to a prevailing business model associated with serious environmental damage and ethical concerns within the fashion industry. This model prioritizes the rapid production and dissemination of inexpensive, trendy clothing, often at the expense of both the environment and the well-being of workers.
Image Source: textileindustry.net
The fast fashion industry’s negative impacts on workers’ ethics are significant and far-reaching. Shockingly, nearly 85% of garment workers, who form the backbone of this industry, do not receive even the minimum wages they deserve. These workers endure harsh conditions, often compelled to toil for extended hours under grueling circumstances.
Some fast fashion brands also resort to sweatshops, where labourers are subjected to extreme conditions and unethical practices. These dire circumstances sometimes extend to the use of child labour, further exacerbating human rights violations.
However, the consequences of fast fashion extend beyond workers’ rights to encompass ecological devastation. The production of a single clothing item necessitates staggering quantities of water, contributing to water scarcity in various regions.
Furthermore, the manufacturing process emits substantial amounts of carbon, fueling climate change and its associated repercussions. The alluringly low prices and trend-driven nature of fast fashion exacerbate its wastefulness—many garments go unsold and end up in landfills. A case in point is the scenario in 2018 when H&M, a prominent fast fashion brand, faced a staggering $4.8 billion worth of unsold clothing. This excess waste strains resources and leads to land pollution, a tangible manifestation of the environmental toll of fast fashion.
Generally, fast fashion is characterized by its rapid, inexpensive production of trendy clothing. Yet, its inherent practices raise critical concerns regarding the mistreatment of workers, the depletion of resources, and environmental degradation. As consumers and industry players become increasingly cognizant of the detrimental consequences of fast fashion, a growing movement toward more sustainable and ethical alternatives is gaining momentum.
Is Gymshark Fast Fashion?
Image Source: offcourt.co
No, Gymshark does not fall under the category of fast fashion brands. While many fashion labels succumb to the allure of fleeting trends and quick turnovers, Gymshark’s distinctive approach sets it apart.
Gymshark’s core focus is providing fitness enthusiasts with comfortable, functional workout apparel and accessories. Unlike typical fast fashion brands like Forever 21, Adika, and Bershka chase ever-changing trends, Gymshark prioritizes performance and comfort over trendy clothing. This strategic emphasis on producing fitness-specific clothing differentiates Gymshark and aligns it with a more sustainable and purpose-driven business model.
In essence, Gymshark’s commitment to creating activewear that caters to the needs of athletes and fitness enthusiasts steers it away from the characteristics typically associated with fast fashion brands. By delivering quality products tailored to the demands of an active lifestyle, Gymshark’s approach resonates with consumers who seek longevity, comfort, and performance in their workout clothing.
Is Gymshark Ethical?
Image Source: licdn.com
Regarding ethical considerations, Gymshark’s stance emerges as somewhat nuanced and multi-faceted. While the company exhibits certain positive attributes regarding social responsibility, it also presents areas that could be further enhanced to solidify its ethical standing.
a) Labor Conditions and Commitment
While commendable, Gymshark’s stance on labour conditions is not without limitations. By aligning with the Fair Labor Association (FLA), an international entity advocating human rights at work, Gymshark exhibits a commitment to fair practices. Notably, when faced with concerns about forced labour within their supply chain, the company took swift action to sever ties with the implicated supplier. However, there’s no conclusive evidence that Gymshark ensures a living wage all around its supply chain, and exceptions permit working hours to extend up to 60 hours per week.
b) Supply Chain Transparency
Gymshark’s transparency in disclosing tier-one and tier-two suppliers is a step in the right direction. This disclosure fosters accountability and facilitates understanding of the brand’s supply chain. Yet, the absence of information regarding tier three and tier four suppliers leaves some gaps in transparency. Greater disclosure in this regard would bolster the company’s commitment to accountability.
c) Material Sourcing
While Gymshark’s commitment to sourcing 100% sustainable cotton through the Better Cotton Initiative showcases a positive intention, the clarity regarding the extent of implementation remains uncertain. Given that cotton production is resource-intensive and often occurs in regions with questionable human rights records, Gymshark’s endeavour to ensure sustainable sourcing is praiseworthy. Yet, without a clear indication of whether all cotton utilized adheres to ethical standards, there’s a possibility that some portion of their cotton comes from less-than-ethical sources.
d) Cruelty-Free Approach
On a positive note, Gymshark stands out as a cruelty-free advocate. Their complete exclusion of animal products from their product range is commendable. All garments and accessories offered by Gymshark are vegan-friendly. Although the brand does not explicitly commit to maintaining this cruelty-free approach perpetually, the current practice is a noteworthy step toward ethical consciousness.
Ethical Verdict
Gymshark’s ethical standing is a nuanced blend of positive actions and room for growth. The company’s commitment to animal welfare by offering cruelty-free products is laudable. However, its approach to labour conditions and supply chain transparency leaves space for improvement.
While Gymshark’s ethical endeavours may not be without merit, they also fail to present the brand as an unequivocally ethical company. By bolstering its commitments to fair labour practices, supply chain transparency, and eco-friendly materials, Gymshark can evolve into a more robust embodiment of ethical responsibility within the fashion industry.
Is Gymshark a Sustainable Company?
Image Source: independent.co.uk
When determining whether Gymshark, the renowned sportswear brand, embodies sustainability, two crucial dimensions demand scrutiny: environmental impact and social responsibility.
a) Environmental Footprint and Transparency
Gymshark’s dedication to environmental stewardship should translate into a robust environmental policy and an annual sustainability report. Regrettably, this aspiration falls short in practice. The scarcity of information on their website related to sustainability raises concerns about the company’s prioritization of environmental concerns.
The Gymshark Transparency Report, released under the banner of ‘Our Promise,’ presents a mixed picture. While it does address certain areas, such as the gender pay gap, supplier code of conduct, and carbon footprint assessment for a specific year, it is marred by a lack of substantial updates. This absence of progress indicates a potential gap between the company’s rhetoric and its actions.
b) Stagnation and Lack of Progress
Despite substantial growth in terms of revenue and scale, Gymshark’s sustainability reporting fails to evolve accordingly. The repetition of figures and goals from prior years casts doubts on the brand’s commitment to tangible improvements. Environmental goal setting, transition to zero carbon energy suppliers, packaging practices, and carbon footprint reports all seem caught in a time warp, remaining stagnant at 2018/19 levels.
Verdict on Sustainability
Considering the dearth of meaningful updates, a lack of progress, and the apparent relegation of sustainability efforts, it is difficult to categorize Gymshark as a sustainable activewear company. The brand’s reluctance to substantially enhance its sustainability initiatives raises concerns that environmental responsibility might be an afterthought in its overarching business strategy.
Is Gymshark Environmentally Friendly?
Image Source: telegraph.co.uk
To evaluate Gymshark’s commitment to environmental friendliness, it’s crucial to delve into the brand’s initiatives and practices about sustainability. Let’s examine several key areas that shed light on Gymshark’s eco-friendly stance:
a) Packaging
Gymshark has demonstrated a degree of eco-consciousness in its packaging choices. Utilizing recycled plastic bottles for mailers, which are also recyclable, showcases a step towards reducing reliance on virgin plastic. The use of post-industrial recycled content for product bags highlights an attempt to minimize waste from the factory floor. While these efforts indicate a positive direction, the fact that these plastic bags necessitate specialized facilities for recycling remains a limitation.
b) Hazardous Chemicals
Gymshark’s association with the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHD) group underscores a commitment to reducing harmful chemical releases. While Gymshark complies with the Restricted Substance List and the REACH restricted substance list, there’s room for clarity regarding the exact chemicals used in their products. The brand’s membership in the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC) further indicates a willingness to address social and environmental impacts.
c) Environmental Reporting
Gymshark’s environmental reporting, specifically concerning carbon emissions, displays both strengths and areas for growth. While covering all three scopes of emissions (direct, energy use, and supply chain), the reporting lacks comprehensive coverage. The absence of recent emissions data is noteworthy, especially given the company’s growth trajectory. Incorporating specific targets and regular reporting would elevate Gymshark’s transparency and accountability.
d) Future Environmental Goals
Gymshark’s aspirations, such as carbon neutrality and the switch to zero-carbon energy suppliers, reflect a positive trajectory. However, the absence of specific targets and timelines for these goals leaves room for ambiguity. Emphasizing emission reduction from the source rather than relying solely on offsetting measures would showcase a more comprehensive approach.
Verdict on Environmental Friendliness
Gymshark’s environmental friendliness is characterized by a blend of efforts and areas for improvement. While commendable steps have been taken, gaps in transparency, reporting, and specific targets hinder a comprehensive assessment. The brand’s commitment to sustainable practices, sourcing, and hazardous chemical reduction is apparent. Still, the road to becoming a genuinely environmentally friendly company requires more comprehensive reporting, transparent material sourcing, and a commitment to reducing the ecological footprint from the outset. As Gymshark strives to enhance its environmental initiatives, the ongoing progress will determine its true impact on the planet and the sustainability of its operations.
Wrapping Up: Is Gymshark a Fast Fashion Brand?
In conclusion, Gymshark stands distinct from the fast fashion realm. Its focus on fitness apparel tailored for performance rather than fleeting trends sets it apart. While challenges remain regarding being a sustainable and ethical company, Gymshark’s commitment to transparency and collaboration with initiatives like the Better Cotton Initiative and Fair Labor Association indicates a genuine effort to evolve into a more sustainable and responsible brand.
